Maps – Kintbury and Beyond

Enborne & the First Battle of Newbury

The church of St Michael & All Angels, Enborne is situated in what must be one of the most peaceful and picturesque corners of West Berkshire. The view from the back of the church looking south, is across farm and woodland to the distant Beacon Hill just over the border in Hampshire. It’s a view that, surely, has not changed much over centuries.

Looking south from St Michael & All Angels, Enborne

In the September of 1645, however, the view south across the churchyard was not a peaceful, pastoral one, but of a battle.

It has to be likely that, in the early 1640s, many of those living in the villages to the west of Newbury would have been little bothered by what had been happening in London, in Parliament, or between the wealthier classes. Charles I’s accession in 1625 meant a different head on the coinage, if you were lucky enough to see some of it. However, many who took an interest in these things felt this new monarch heralded a more optimistic period.

Some were concerned because his wife, the new Queen, Henrietta Maria, was of the Roman Catholic faith leading them to suspect that the new King was sympathetic to Catholicism and the views of the Pope in Rome, too. England was now a largely Protestant country and many people believed the Catholic faith was a threat. But for now, that could be put to one side.

However, the optimism was not to last. Many of those closer to Charles found him a difficult person to work with and this problem was exacerbated by the fact that the new King seemed to want to rule without any reference to the will of parliament. As monarch, Charles was not able to raise money through taxation without the approval of parliament and when parliament said no to his requests, in 1642 he tried – and failed – to have certain members arrested.

After this, unsurprisingly, Charles’ relationship with parliament deteriorated rapidly particularly as there were other issues of contention. Inevitably, sides were taken and what had started as a war of words tragically became a war of weapons.

It is easy to caricature the King’s supporters as being wealthier and from the upper classes, High Anglican with Catholic sympathies, flamboyant in their dress and with ready and available armaments and the ability to mobilise easily.

By contrast a caricature of a Parliamentarian would be a non- conformist, soberly dressed foot soldier from the less wealthy sections of society and with a distrust of any church which seemed to have Catholic sympathies.

Whilst both these caricatures are true to a certain extent, the reality was much more complex. Many men were drawn into taking sides because of pressure from the influential and powerful in their town or village and there were many families who found themselves with divided loyalties.

Also, it would be wrong to think of all wealthier families as supporting the King. Although the Dolman family at Shaw House were Royalist supporters – to the extent that Charles stayed at Shaw House on the eve of the second Battle of Newbury – the Popham family at Littlecoat House near Hungerford were Parliamentarians.

C17th map showing Hungerford, Kintbury & Enborne with Newbury to the west

Unlike, for example, World War I, in which the Allies were defending the Western Front, there was no “front” as such in the English Civil War. Instead, troops found themselves defending or attacking towns and cities across the country and the pattern of warfare became complex and confusing.

By August 1643, King Charles had taken siege of Gloucester in an attempt to take control from the Parliamentarians. However by early September he was defeated by the Parliamentarian Earl of Essex who subsequently set out to return to London whilst avoiding the Royalist troops in Oxford.

Essex’s route took him through Cirencester, reaching Swindon on September 17th. From there he intended to take the road now known as the Bath Road or A4, skirting Hungerford slightly to the north and on to Newbury. However, when it became clear that this route could be strategically unsafe, he decided to cross the Kennet at Hungerford and march his troops along the narrower lanes eastwards through Kintbury and Hamspead Marshall.

The weather was extremely wet and the narrow lanes deep in mud. For the unsuspecting inhabitants of Kintbury, the sight of hundreds of weary, wet and mud-splattered soldiers marching through the village and up Newbury Street must have been terrifying.

Military Odyssey 2007 English Civil War Reenactment
Tim Sheerman-Chase
Creative Commons Attribution 2.0

The Parliamentary Quartermasters rode on into Newbury where they were well received by townspeople who had prepared food and lodging for the troops. However, Charles’ troops, led by Prince Rupert, had advanced faster than the Parliamentarians realised, riding into Newbury from the north west, capturing some of Essex’s men, commandeering the provisions and taking the town for the King.

With Royalist troops at Newbury, Essex lost any hope of progressing eastwards and on to London. While the King’s troops spent the night of September 19th in the town, occupying the billets and eating the food originally prepared for the Parliamentarians, Essex and his men were left to camp in the wet and the mud of the open country. Some men camped around Enborne and others on lower ground towards Skinner’s Green. Essex himself is believed to have spent the night at Bigg’s Cottage on the edge of Wash Common. The cottge is still there, in Enborne Street, Wash Common.

Biggs’ Cottage. Illustration from Walter Money’s History of Newbury, originally published 1905

Some time during the night, Royalist troops rode up to the higher ground at Wash Common. However, they neglected to position troops on the higher ground to the north known as Round Hill. So, in the early hours of 20^th September, Parliamentary troops led by Major-General Philip Skippon advanced down Skinner’s Green Lane to take up their position on Round Hill.

Philip Skippon, Sergeant-Major General of Foot in the service of Parliament during the English civil wars
Unknown author
Public domain

It is worth mentioning the numbers of fighting men involved at this time. There were, it is believed, around 14,000 Royalist combatants and 15,000 Parliamentarians. Very few of these men were what we would consider today as professional soldiers. Although the troops on both sides were being led by men with titles or who belonged to the nobility, many were ordinary working people who had left their homes, their families and their everyday jobs far, far away. And all this was happening across the swathe of countryside we can still see from the back of St Michael’s church at Enborne.

Pikeman of the Parliamentary Army outside St Michael’s Church, Enbourn. These re enactors keep alive the memory of those who fought and died here in 1743

Then, as now, this countryside was crossed by a network of narrow lanes lined by the banks and hedges which delineated enclosures. Thus it was impossible for cavalry charges of the kind often depicted in later artwork, neither couold infantry units advance as they could in open country.

In the early hours of September 20th, Skippon’s men, postioned on Round Hill, opened fire on the Royalist troops. They responded with an attack to the west of Wash Common and across Dark Lane.

Plan of the First Battle of Newbury (1643)
Walter Money (1877);
Public domain

Prince Rupert led his men into three charges across Wash Common whilst the Royalists’ brigade of foot attacked Round Hill. Then, their brigade of horse, led by Sir John Byron, attacked Round Hill from the north. It was during this advance that Lucius Cary, Viscount Falkland , rode through a gap in a hedge and into the enemy fire. A membert of parliament and one of King Charles’ secretaries of state, Falkland was a bright and able man whose prospects, in other times, would have shown much promise.

Lucius Cary (1610–1643), 2nd Viscount Falkland – 598081.1 – by Cornelius Johnson (1593-1661) –

He was peace loving man who abhorred what was happening to his country, and it is believed that he rode into eneny fire deliberately to die on the battle field. He was thirty three.

The Royalist brigade of horse succeeded in pushing Skippon’s men back across Round Hill but Skippon responded by calling the advance of the London Trained Bands. These were a part-time militia from the City of London who had long been trained as a defensive force, in contrast to many of the volunteer forces. With increased fire power and the stand of the pikemen, the Parliamentarians were able to force the Royalist cavalry back.

To anyone looking south and across the valley from St Michael’s churchyard, any peace and tranquillity would have been painfully shattered. The thud of cannon fire , the blast of the muskets, the screams of both horses and men would have reached the higher ground though it would have been impossible, at that distance to know who was winning.

OS map of 1889 showing the site of the Battle of Newbury

The fighting continued until nightfall after which the Royalist forces had to consider what to do next. But supplies of gun powder and musket shot were low so it was decided not to resume fighting at this time. Essex and his men were able to continue their march towards London.

The battle left hundreds of men from both sides dead. It has been estimated that fatalities reached 3,500 with greater losses being on the Royalist side.

A network of narrow lanes still winds across the land between Enborne and Wash Common just as it did in 1743. To this day it is easy to take a wrong turning if you are not very familiar with the lay of the land. The extent of the slaughter on that day in September is difficult to visualise and it must have taken weeks if not months to recover the bodies, many of who would have remained unidentified.

No one knows where the majority of the men were buried although it is believed that some lie in Enborne church yard. The mounds on Wash Common were long believed to be Civil War graves but these are in fact Neolithic or Bronze Age burial mounds. An example of how local myths or legends occur. Similarly, the village of Gore End, to the south west of Wash Common, was thought to have been named as the place where the blood from the battle stopped running. Another example of a rural myth.

However, today many of the roads on Wash Common are named in memory of the battle, including Essex Street, Charles Street and Battery End. The Falkland Memorial, a granite obelisque errected in 1878 to commemorate Lucius Cary as well as nameless others killed in the battle, has given rise, over the years, to the name Falkland being applied to a local parliamentary ward, a primary school, a dental practice and a vets amongst other businesses.

Late C19th OS map showing the Neolithic burial mounds long thought to be graves of the Civil War dead. It also shows the Falkland Memorial and a farm named for Lord Falkland.

Newbury was once again the scene of a battle, in October 1644, but this time the focus of the fighting was around Donnington Castle. For the most part, Enborne and the surrounding villages saw much less of the military action. Until, that is, three hundred years later, when Enborne and Hamstead Park were to host the military again – this time from the USA.

Sources:

britishbattles.com/english-civil-war/first-battle-of-newbury/

The First & Second Battles of Newbury: Walter Money

A History of Newbury: Walter Money

First Newbury, 1643 : Graham Turner

National Library of Scotland O.S. maps

First Battle of Newbury

West Woodhay: A downland village in a changing agricultural landscape

This post is in two parts. In the first part, I consider the village of West Woodhay from a changing historical perspective. For the second part, we are delighted to have a contribution from Harry Henderson of West Woodhay Farms in which he describes the recent changes in agricultural practices which have enabled vitally important regeneration of the land.

On the road to nowhere in particular, the hamlet of West Woodhay is situated in the extreme south of West Berkshire just below the North Hampshire downs, a little over two miles south of Kintbury as the crow flies.

The Road to West Woodhay: Des Blenkinsop via Creative Commons

Although a motte is all that remains now of a twelfth century hunting lodge, today the village is probably best known for the elegant grade one listed West Woodhay House and also the grade two listed St Laurence’s church with windows by Morris & Co.

Early censuses show that most of the population were engaged in agriculture during the nineteenth century; early maps of the village suggest there has been little if any development, so, on the whole it might be presumed that very little of any great note has ever happened here. However, the effects of very significant changes in agricultural practices can be traced in the history of this village and the surrounding area.

The eighteenth century saw many developments in agriculture, enabling increased food production necessary to feed the growing population. Whilst innovations in agricultural machinery, such as the horse drawn seed drill developed by Jethro Tull of Prosperous Farm, near Hungerford, made the cultivation of larger fields much easier, this had a downside for thousands of rural labourers.

Since medieval times, many rural families had cultivated strips or patches of land, often dotted around their parishes, relying upon what they could grow to feed their families. However such a system was useless for food production on a large scale. The 1773 Inclosure Act enabled the Lords of the Manor or other land owners to enclose the diverse patches and strips of land, creating large fields each devoted to one particular crop and of the size that could be cultivated using new machinery. Whilst this might have been good news for the markets, it was devastating for many who lost their ability to grow their own food.

The effects of the 1773 Act were not felt straight away although it was eventually to change the face of the English countryside.

The Hampshire Chronicle of July 1816 reported that an Act of Parliament had been passed for the inclosure (sic) of Woodhay Common. However, “the labouring poor in that neighbourhood have lately shewn strong symptoms of their disapprobation and at length proceeded so far as to collect in considerable numbers with the avowed intention of preventing the farmers ( to whom it had been allotted ) from breaking it up.”

Fearful of trouble, the authorities called out military back-up which arrived in the form of the “Donnington and Newbury Troop under the command of Capt. Bacon” and also “Oxford blues ( who had been sent from Maidenhead )”

It is hard to believe that anyone would have felt it necessary to employ the military to prevent any sort of a riot in such a quiet and peaceful corner of the county. It is hard to imagine troops, not just from nearby Newbury but also from Maidenhead, well over a day’s ride away, descending on the village. Insurrection is not something you would associate with West Woodhay.

However, due to the “spirited exertions of constables” the military were not required although several of those involved in the protest were bound over to appear at the Quarter Sessions.

Enclosures were not the only things to make life increasingly difficult for the rural poor. Harsh game laws meant the penalty for catching rabbits for the pot could be transportation and poor harvests in the 1820s resulted in increased prices, particularly for bread.

William Cobbett was a writer and campaigner born in 1763 to a Hampshire farming family. Critical of the way new laws impacted upon the rural population, in 1821 Cobbett set out on a series of “Rural Rides” to observe for himself the situation throughout the midlands and south of England. Amongst other things, Cobbett was critical of the amount of money the country was spending on defence rather than on improved conditions for the rural poor. One of those of whom he was particularly critical was Berkshire M.P. and Kintbury resident, Charles Dundas. A prominent and influential figure, Dundas would have been well known across local towns and villages.

Although it is not always easy to work out Cobbett’s exact route through the countryside, it is clear from reading his work that he travelled across North Wiltshire and into Berkshire, stopping at Newbury on October 17th.

Whilst at a public dinner in Newbury, Cobbett took the opportunity to call out Dundas’s false accusation that he, Cobbett, was complicit in a plot to assassinate the Prime Minister and members of the cabinet. Known as the Cato Street conspiracy, those involved were eventually either executed or transported. For Dundas to accuse Cobbett of complicity was a particularly serious slur and something which reflects how polarised political views were at this time.

Later, Cobbett observed that “a good part” of the wheat offered for sale at Newbury market was wholly unfit for bread flour. Considering the importance of bread in the diet of poorer people, this must have led to severe consequences locally.

Not everything Cobbett observed as he rode through the downland was negative, however. At one point as he rode across the downs, he observed, “immense flocks of sheep which were now ( at ten o’clock ) just going from their several folds, to the downs for the day..”

The “immense flocks” aside, there was, as Cobbett noted, little to impress in the daily lives of the agricultural workers. Enclosures, the rising cost of bread and harsh laws which mitigated particularly against rural people, and changes in agricultural practices such as the introduction of mechanisation made life for the agricultural worker extremely difficult. The bad harvest of 1830 was the tipping point, leading to what became known as the “swing riots” which broke out in December of that year.

Although most of the protests in this part of West Berkshire were centred on and around Kintbury, West Woodhay did not escape the disorder. Here, Cornelius Bennett and Henry Honey were charged with robbery although both were subsequently acquitted. However, shock waves must have rippled across this part of Berkshire when it was reported that others of the rioters had been charged at Reading Assizes with several transported to Australia and one executed for his involvement.

In the following years, however, the agricultural industry in England generally was thriving. But this was not to last and by the 1870s it was in depression. By 1893 an anonymous contributor wrote to the Newbury Weekly News:

“There are thousands of acres not tenanted at all, and scores of landlords only too anxious to let on almost any terms.”

He continues:

“The real cause of agricultural depression is very easy to find, but very difficult to remedy. It is because the enormous development of steam navigation has brought the millions and millions of foreign acres into practical proximity to our shores and accompanied by a full market has made England a central emporium of a huge percentage of the surplus produce of the world.”

Throughout England, the numbers of people engaged in agriculture, particularly as labourers, declined as many sought better paid factory work in towns and cities. In West Woodhay, the 1851 census records William Taylor of West Woodhay farm as employing 15 labourers. By 1861 the farm has been taken by an in-comer from Buckinghamshire, Job Wooster, who employs 9 labourers. By the 1881 census, there are just 16 agricultural labourers in the whole of the village.

Throughout the early years of the 20^th century, many young people from rural communities emigrated to the colonies such as Canada or Australia to try their hand at agricultural work far from home. Whilst I have not been able to discover how many pioneering young men or woman left the villages of West Berkshire in this way, it has to be likely that some, at least, would have done so.

The twentieth century witnessed two world wars during which thousands of agricultural workers from all over the country enlisted in the armed forces. To make up the short fall in manpower, thousands of young women joined the Women’s Land Army and were posted to rural areas throughout the UK. In July of 1918 the Reading Standard featured on its front page photographs of some of these women at work on Berkshire farms under the bold sub-headings:

THEY MILK THE COWS

AND FEED THE PIGS

AND TRUSS THE LOADS OF HAY

most probably to the cynical and wry amusement of those rural woman who had been undertaking farm work for decades.

The 1939 Register lists 24 people engaged in agriculture in West Woodhay although it is difficult to draw an exact comparison with numbers of agricultural workers at the time of the nineteenth century censuses in part due to changing definitions of occupation. However it is true to say that the village had remained a predominantly agricultural community.

It is now over 200 years since West Woodhay Common was enclosed and 195 years since the Swing Riots. Although the associated violence is now very much in the past, the farm lands of West Woodhay still reflect the changing agricultural practices and the need for farming to respond to changing times.

For the second part of this post we are grateful to Harry Henderson whose family owns and runs West Woodhay Farms, an estate on the Berkshire/Hampshire border.

West Woodhay church: Matthew Prior via Creative Commons

Farming for the Future: Soil, Sustainability, and Success at West Woodhay

Harry Henderson

The estate spans 830 hectares of challenging land with fragile soils. Since 2008, a regenerative agricultural policy has been in place, with a focus on prioritizing soil health. The estate now follows a crop rotation system that includes herbal grass leys, flower meadows, wild bird feed areas, and very low-input cereals.

Agricultural chemicals and fertilizers have been replaced with more sustainable cultural methods. As a result, there has been a significant increase in soil biology, leading to enhanced organic matter levels and improved carbon capture.

The shift in farming practices—driven by soil health—has led to remarkable nature recovery. The planting of herbal leys and wildflower plots has created a thriving environment for insect life. Since adopting a no-insecticide policy in 2014, West Woodhay has seen a resurgence of beneficial insects such as spiders, beetles, and parasitic wasps. This has enabled the successful establishment of flea beetle-sensitive crops like stubble turnips.

The rise in insect populations has also benefited birdlife, which is supported further through the planting of wild bird plots for the leaner months. All this recovery work has been monitored and independently audited over many years, and the data clearly shows a strong link between soil health and biodiversity.

In-depth soil analyses have shown that, given time and the absence of soil disturbance, soil indices can begin to rebalance naturally, making primary nutrients more available to crops. This reinforces the estate’s approach of minimal intervention and maximum biological support.

A large sheep flock has been used to manage the land and maintain productivity. The breed of choice is the Welsh Cheviot, native to the Brecon Beacons. With West Woodhay’s highest point reaching 900 feet, this hardy breed is ideally suited to the challenging upland climate. Their thick, dense fleece protects them from January’s easterly winds and rain.

Lambing begins in late March, with all ewes lambing outdoors in a natural environment, giving mothers plenty of space and time to bond with their lambs. During the summer months, the flock grazes on the herbal leys, enriching the soil’s biodiversity. After weaning in early autumn, they are moved to higher ground to help manage the fragile downland ecosystem.

The estate’s latest and most exciting initiative is the production of cereal crops for human consumption, grown with little or no artificial fertilizers or pesticides. These crops are established using zero-tillage methods. By using legumes to naturally supply nutrients for fast-growing spring cereals, West Woodhay has successfully tapped into new opportunities through Wildfarmed contracts.

Importantly, the farming enterprise has remained consistently profitable. Without profit, nature recovery would be difficult to sustain. Savings on fertilizers, agrochemicals, fuel, finance, and labour have helped support this transition. The increase in soil organic matter has broadened the estate’s cropping options, helping to future-proof the farm for the next generation.

Charles Wright & the White Horse of Inkpen

There are many hill figures cut into the chalk downland of southern Britain. The oldest and probably the most famous is the Uffington White Horse in Oxfordshire (formerly in Berkshire before 1974) cut into the scarp slope of the North Wessex Downs overlooking the Upper Thames Valley, which is over 3,000 years old.

By contrast, the Fovant Badges were originally cut in the years after the First World War. These depictions of military badges were cut to honour the hundreds of soldiers who had been training near the village of Fovant in south west Wiltshire.

Fovant badges Marchibald.fly via Creative Commons

Dorset boasts two hill figures. The horse and rider on Osmington Down near Weymouth was created in 1808 in honour of George III, a frequent visitor to the town. However, no one really knows why the Cerne Abbas giant – a figure of more likely humorous or satirical intent – was created above the village in Early Medieval times.

Humerous or satirical intent?
Pete Harlow via Creative Commons

However, the majority of white horses can be found across Wiltshire. The Westbury white horse is believed to have been made sometime in the late seventeenth century which would make it the oldest figure in the county. Next comes the white horse above Cherhill, which is believed to date from 1780. Pewsey’s horse was cut in 1785 and then in 1808, pupils at a boys’ school in Marlborough constructed the town’s white horse.

The Cherhill white horse
Brian Robert Marshall via Creative Commons

At Broad Hinton, it is believed that the parish clerk, Henry Eatwell, may have been responsible for the Hackpen Hill white horse, which was constructed in 1838 to commemorate Queen Victoria’s coronation.

Broad Hinton white horse
Brian Robert Marshall via Creative Commons

The Devizes white horse first appeared in 1845. Then, rather later than the rest, Broad Town in 1885.

But how many people know that, sometime in the early 1870s, Inkpen was added to this list?

The Ordnance Survey map, Berkshire, Sheet XLI, surveyed in 1873 and published in 1877, does indeed show another white horse, situated on the north facing slope of Inkpen Hill and just over the county boundary in Wiltshire.

So, who was responsible for Inkpen’s white horse and what happened that we can no longer see it?

The Inkpen ( or Ham ) white horse was constructed on land owned as part of the Ham Spray estate, just to the east of the small village of Ham in Wiltshire and to the west of Inkpen, Berkshire. In 1869 it was bought by the then thirty year old Charles Wright. In the 1871 census, Wright is described as a farmer of 370 acres employing 8 men and 4 boys, so is clearly quite successful.

Wright had been born in 1839 in the Leicestershire village of Market Bosworth. In 1841 he is living with his grandfather, a clergyman and in 1851 he is a boarder at a grammar school in Derby. By the age of 22 he is living with his father and his older brother Thomas who is in the military. Charles himself is described as “gent”: a very precise distinction at this socially divided time.

Ten years later, Thomas Wright has a seat of his own: Tidmington House in Worcestershire, where he lives with his wife and eight staff. Younger brother Charles has relocated to the south west.

When Charles Wright bought Ham Spray House, it was a modern building still only around thirty years old. Perhaps Charles wanted to establish his own seat, distinct and away from the family in Leicestershire.

Ham Spray House
Charles Richard Sanders via Creative Commons

Some nineteenth century landowners become high profile figures within their towns or villages and their names feature frequently in the local press. This cannot be said of Charles Wright in the time he lived at Ham Spray House. The only reference I can find to him in local papers, aside from details of the sale of his property, was when he contributed generously, along with other local gentry, to a fund for the sick.

Finding himself in a county famed for its white horses cut into the chalk downland, Wright may have wanted the distinction of adding to that number. Perhaps he wanted to impress his neighbours, or just to add to the view from his house. So, sometime in the early 1870s he had his workers cut the outline of a horse into the downs. The new white horse must have been distinctive enough for the Ordnance Survey surveyors to notice it when working in the area in 1873 and include it on the latest edition of the O.S. map, published four years later..

However, the 1877 O.S. map is the only one to include the new, Inkpen white horse. Sadly, it did not endure partly because it had been constructed by stripping away the turf with out digging and packing out trenches with compacted chalk. Further, subsequent landowners did not bother to clear away the encroaching grass.

Charles Wright died on 12^th December 1876 at Ham Spray House. He was only 37. The estate, his house and all its contents were sold. His time at Ham Spray House, like that of his newly cut white horse on the downs above Inkpen, had been brief.

https://www.wiltshirewhitehorses.org.uk/index.html

Ancestry

British newspaper Archive

From a dig at Inkpen to the skies above Stonehenge:

O.G.S. Crawford – the man who put history on the O.S. Maps

I have always enjoyed looking at Ordnance Survey maps – to plan routes for days out or just afternoon walks, or simply to see the names of woods, rivers, hills or countless other features all carefully recorded. But for me one of the most fascinating features of O.S. maps are those places labelled in a gothic or Old English font which indicate a site of historic or archaeological significance. “Walbury”, “long barrow” ( on Gallows Down ) and “moat” ( at Balsden Farm ) are all good examples from the Kintbury area.

Although the Ordnance Survey started publishing maps over 200 years ago, originally for military purposes, it was not until the 1920s that historic and archaeological sites were first identified as they are now. And the person first responsible for including that information had an interesting connection with our area.

Osbert Guy Stanhope Crawford was born in 1886 in Bombay, India where his father was a judge. However, as his mother died soon after his birth, he was sent back to England to live in London with two of his aunts. While the young Osbert was still of school age, he moved with them to The Grove, East Woodhay, a few miles from Kintbury and just over the border in Hampshire. Later the Crawfords relocated to Tan House, Donnington, just outside Newbury.

Crawford was educated at Marlborough College in Wiltshire and it was there that his interest in archaeology grew. As a member of the College’s Natural History Society, Crawford visited various Wiltshire archaeological sites such as Stonehenge, West Kennet Long Barrow and Avebury.

From Marlborough, Crawford went up Oxford University where his interest in archaeology continued. In 1908, whilst still a student, he excavated a Bronze Age round barrow at Inkpen, not far from his aunts’ East Woodhay home, as well as other – possibly less successful – work excavating at Walbury Beacon.

It was around this time that Crawford became friends with archaeologist and anthropologist Harold Peake and his wife Charlotte, excavating with them at Botley Copse near Marlborough. Harold Peake is particularly remembered in this area as being curator of the Borough of Newbury Museum from 1867 to 1946 and the person responsible for building up an important collection for what was later to become the West Berkshire Museum.

The Peakes lived at Westbrook House, Boxford, just to the north of Kintbury. Their interests included not only archaeology and anthropology but music, folklore and drama and they were very supported of younger people such as Crawford. It is believed that, under Peake’s influence, Crawford began to question the kind of extreme religious beliefs held by his aunts, in favour of a more science-based world view.

After graduating from Oxford, Crawford worked as an archaeologist in both Britain and Sudan. During the First World War he served as a photographer with the Royal Flying Corp but spent time in a German P.O.W. camp, having been shot down.

In the 1920s, Crawford worked for the Ordnance Survey in Southampton, as its first Archaeological Officer. It was around this time that historians and archaeologists began to use aerial photography in identifying and interpreting historic sites which could no longer be seen clearly above ground. The remains of structures and earth works which have long disappeared can be identified through crop marks and shadows which can then be studied using aerial photographs. Crawford’s time with the Royal Flying Corp would have given him first hand experience of how useful such photographs can be.

Crawford used the study of aerial photographs as well as information gathered from local antiquarian and historical societies to identify the locations of many ancient monuments which would not have been visible to cartographers working in the field. He also conducted his own surveys, often travelling across the countryside on his bicycle. Crawford then annotated each O.S. map by hand, adding the names and locations we are now familiar with but which today are identified on our maps in a gothic font.

At this time, Alexander Keiller, heir to the family fortune made in marmalade, was living at Avebury Manor. An amateur archaeologist, he had been involved in excavating the world-famous neolithic henge and other associated sites. In 1924 Crawford joined Keiller in an aerial survey of Wiltshire and Somerset as well as Berkshire, Hampshire and Dorset and in 1928 they published Wessex From The Air, a groundbreaking aerial photography survey of our area and the landscape of the wider Wessex.

Crawford assisted Keiller in the fund raising which enabled Stonehenge to be bought for the nation, and in 1927 he founded the influential archaeological journal, Antiquity.

Keiller worked for the O.S. until 1946 when he turned his attention to the preservation of those historic buildings in Southampton which had survived the devastation of the blitz during the Second World War.

Today, O.G.S. Crawford is recognised as an important figure in twentieth century archaeology. It is interesting to think that this important career began in part with an excavation at Inkpen and a friendship in Boxford.

Crawford died in 1957.

Sources:

https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/about/history

https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/archive/collections/aerial-photos/

https://hantsfieldclub.org.uk/ihr100/profiles-c/crawford.html

https://www.sarsen.org/2018/04/capturing-material-invisible-ogs.html